World Immigration News

Protected No More – How States Are Responding to Immigration Enforcement in Sensitive Locations

Release Date
2025-04-11
Media
Immigration Impact
Summary
For nearly 15 years, immigrants in the U.S. could access essential services like healthcare, education, and worship without fear of immigration enforcement due to the “protected areas” policy. This changed on the first day of the Trump administration, which revoked the policy, allowing immigration enforcement to occur anywhere, including schools and courthouses. As a result, many immigrants now avoid critical services out of fear, leading to missed medical appointments and reduced school attendance.

Federal Response:
Following the policy's rescission, multiple lawsuits were filed to restore protections. While a judge temporarily blocked enforcement in some houses of worship, another court allowed it to continue in schools. Congress reintroduced the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act (H.R. 1061) to limit enforcement within 1,000 feet of sensitive locations, including new sites like polling places and labor unions.

State and Local Response:
States such as Massachusetts, New Mexico, and New York issued guidance on handling federal enforcement. Others, including California, Arizona, and Illinois, reaffirmed their commitment to protecting immigrant communities. Cities like Los Angeles and Chicago launched campaigns to inform residents of their rights.

Several states are proposing new laws:

Maryland would require state guidance to limit enforcement in schools and courthouses.

Rhode Island proposes that schools and health facilities deny federal agents access without a warrant.

California seeks to mandate immediate notification to communities if immigration officers appear on school grounds.

In the absence of federal safeguards, state and local governments are stepping up to inform and protect immigrant communities.
Tags
USA

News Articles including "USA"

Released on
Article Title
Tags